Yesterday, in light of the scandal unfolding at the General Services Administration, a reader wrote:
Bradford,
I wonder if you’re going to do an update to this month’s LAND MATTERS. Your buddy Robert Peck got canned for misusing tax dollars. No wonder so many architects are flocking to the GSA. It seems the agency thinks it’s Google or Apple and can spend like drunken sailors while those of us in the private sector have seen layoffs and severe cutbacks in benefits.
Great timing on your column.
As for an update, I initially said no to this reader. But I really should provide one, which would be that the positive views expressed toward GSA in my April column are basically unchanged, including my view of Robert Peck, the head of the Public Buildings Service and one of two top executives fired by the administrator, Martha Johnson, before she resigned earlier this month. Peck is not my buddy, by the way, but is someone whose excellent work in the public sector I have admired. If you read the pertinent testimony and exhibits carefully, you may conclude, as I have so far, that Peck’s main bad luck was that of a political appointee in charge of a part of a federal agency that had a regional (career) manager with sociopathic spending habits.
Speaking as a taxpayer, though, I still have no doubts about the enormous value GSA has brought to the country with better architecture, landscape architecture, and design over the past 20 years. This scandal seems to have first been uncovered, as you might hope it would be, by an alert GSA accounting employee. Apart from it, though, if I were looking for really serious federal government waste and abuse of tax money, that is, with a few more zeros behind it, GSA would hardly be the first place I’d go looking.








