Posted in DETAILS, LAM MAGAZINE, NOW, PRACTICE, RESEARCH, TECH, tagged 3-D Printing, Denver, drones, Jon Altschuld, Lumion, Maps Made Easy, Phantom 4, Samsung Gear VR, Small Firm, technology, THK Associates, virtual reality on March 16, 2017|
2 Comments »
BY DANIEL TAL, ASLA
When it comes to new technologies, small investments can lead to big returns.
As at many small firms, five years ago, the technology in THK Associates’s office mainly consisted of hand-drawn plans, some 3-D modeling, Photoshop, and CAD. Now, the firm is incorporating drones, 3-D printing, and virtual reality into many of its projects. Thanks in large part to Jon Altschuld, ASLA, a landscape architect and project manager at the Denver-based firm, THK is an example of how small firms can integrate new technologies into practice with little overhead.
On a number of recent projects, the firm used drones to collect 3-D terrain data and turn it into high-resolution aerials. Using an application called Maps Made Easy, Altschuld can automate the flight path of the firm’s Phantom 4 drone in as little as 15 minutes. The drone snaps a series of photographs that are then uploaded to Maps Made Easy’s cloud server, (more…)
Read Full Post »
Posted in EDUCATION, ENVIRONMENT, IDEAS, LAM MAGAZINE, PLANNING, PRACTICE, RESEARCH, STUDENTS, tagged ASLA, AutoCAD, computer, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Gale Fulton, Geographic Information Systems, Grasshopper, hand-drawing, Heike Rahmann, Jillian Walliss, Landscape Architecture and Digital Technologies, representation, Rhino, technology on October 27, 2016|
Leave a Comment »
REVIEWED BY GALE FULTON, ASLA
Warning: possible confirmation bias ahead.
One of the most perplexing aspects of landscape architecture education and practice that I’ve encountered is what I’ll grossly refer to here as representation. In the nearly two decades that I’ve been a student, professional, or involved in some capacity with teaching at the university level, I can think of no other domain as consistently polarizing than the critically important area of how landscape architects generate and communicate their ideas. Perhaps the most pernicious aspect of this issue is the ongoing divide between digital and analog processes—using the computer versus hand drawing. At first glance, one may likely assume this issue to simply be generational—older generations of designers were not educated in the use of the computer and so are less accepting of it than of those techniques and media with which they were trained. But, surprisingly, there seems to be a continued skepticism or distancing from advanced computational processes even by those of the postdigital generations, which is much more troubling given that these will be the future leaders of the discipline, and, as the authors of this book so effectively demonstrate, not embracing the digital in a robust way at this point significantly reduces the potential of the discipline to have the type of impact it aspires to have.
Landscape Architecture and Digital Technologies: Re-Conceptualising Design and Making, by Jillian Walliss and Heike Rahmann, both academics based in Australia, is a well-reasoned, well-written, and at times polemical book. It critiques landscape architecture’s failure to more fully embrace the potentials of digital media. It educates readers about the ways designers are using sophisticated digital processes right now in very real professional and academic projects and research. And it aspires for landscape architecture to leverage digital technology (more…)
Read Full Post »
Posted in LAM MAGAZINE, VIEWS, tagged 3-D modeling, AIA, architecture, AutoCAD, Autodesk, BIM, BIM for Landscape, BIMForum, CAD, Civil 3D, computer, design, landscape information modeling, LIM, planning, Revit, SIM, site information modeling, software, technology, The Landscape Institute, Vectorworks on February 16, 2016|
6 Comments »
BY BRIAN BARTH
Landscape architects feel the push of architecture-centric software.
Building information modeling, or BIM, has become the default digital format for designing buildings, bridges, and other infrastructure the world over, though in theory it is just as applicable to landscape design. You are not likely to find an architecture or engineering firm that does not employ BIM software, but there are surprisingly few landscape architecture firms that do. It’s not that landscape architects don’t appreciate the information-rich approach of BIM—quite the contrary—but many loathe its building-centric nature.
“Landscape architecture as a profession is kind of down on BIM,” says James Sipes, a landscape architect based in Atlanta who was an early proponent of adapting the technology for landscape architecture purposes. “It seemed to be exactly what we were looking for—that combination of CAD and 3-D modeling and smart software that linked things together in the way we as landscape architects design.” But, Sipes says, companies like Autodesk, which publishes Revit, a BIM software used widely by architects, “put a lot of time and energy into building BIM data for buildings and building components, but none of that had anything to do with landscape architecture.”
All of which would be fine if landscape architects weren’t being pulled into (more…)
Read Full Post »